USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
Can we estimate privacy vulnerability of individual records? Towards Mitigating Attribute Inference Attacks on ML Models
Ehsanul Kabir, Najrin Sultana, Ninghui Li, Shagufta Mehnaz
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has brought transformative applications across various sectors, including sensitive fields like healthcare, finance, and customer analytics. However, ML models are susceptible to privacy leaks, especially through attribute inference and model inversion attacks, raising concerns for data confidentiality in privacy-critical domains. Existing defenses pursue much broader objectives than specifically preventing privacy leakage from attribute inference attacks, and as a result often fail to provide fine-grained, vulnerability-aware protection without significant utility costs. Motivated by this need, we first investigate record-level vulnerability estimation through NeighVE, an adversary-side tool designed to identify which individual records are more exposed to inference. Insights from NeighVE reveal that the record-level risk of privacy leakage is largely agnostic to model architectures and attack strategies and is instead governed by dataset-level characteristics, particularly the distribution of sensitive attributes in the local neighborhood of each record. Building on this insight, we propose VESL, a subspace-learning–inspired defense that mitigates attribute-inference leakage while keeping utility loss to a bare minimum. As a byproduct of its balancing mechanism, VESL also improves fairness across sensitive attributes and prevents NeighVE from reliably identifying vulnerable records. As a supporting contribution, we introduce AttriVET, an estimator that predicts which individual records are vulnerable with over 90% accuracy across diverse scenarios, enabling risk-aware defense design and auditing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d458e2f4-bcd0-442a-a071-53cba4be5d2cBuilds on20
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Disparate Privacy Vulnerability: Targeted Attribute Inference Attacks and DefensesEhsanul Kabir, Lucas Craig, Shagufta MehnazUSENIX Security 2025
- Are Attribute Inference Attacks Just Imputation?Bargav Jayaraman, David EvansCCS 2022 · 42 citations
- Are Your Sensitive Attributes Private? Novel Model Inversion Attribute Inference Attacks on Classification ModelsShagufta Mehnaz, Sayanton V. Dibbo, Ehsanul Kabir, Ninghui Li et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Please Tell Me More: Privacy Impact of Explainability through the Lens of Membership Inference AttackHan Liu, Yuhao Wu, Zhiyuan Yu, Ning ZhangS&P 2024 · 52 citations
- MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace TrainingJiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, Bruno RibeiroUSENIX Security 2024 · 16 citations
