A Formal Foundation for Secure Remote Execution of Enclaves
Pramod Subramanyan, Rohit Sinha, Ilia A. Lebedev, Srinivas Devadas, Sanjit A. Seshia
Abstract
Recent proposals for trusted hardware platforms, such as Intel SGX and the MIT Sanctum processor, offer compelling security features but lack formal guarantees. We introduce a verification methodology based on a trusted abstract platform (TAP), a formalization of idealized enclave platforms along with a parameterized adversary. We also formalize the notion of secure remote execution and present machine-checked proofs showing that the TAP satisfies the three key security properties that entail secure remote execution: integrity, confidentiality and secure measurement. We then present machine-checked proofs showing that SGX and Sanctum are refinements of the TAP under certain parameterizations of the adversary, demonstrating that these systems implement secure enclaves for the stated adversary models. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Formal methods and theory of security; Security in hardware; Trusted computing; Information flow control;
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d0150bde-56d9-49b1-86cd-3dbdca5c947eCited by top-tier papers25
- Keystone: an open framework for architecting trusted execution environmentsDayeol Lee, David Kohlbrenner, Shweta Shinde, Krste Asanovic et al.EuroSys 2020 · 381 citations
- Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split LearningOscar Li, Jiankai Sun, Xin Yang, Weihao Gao et al.ICLR 2022 · 170 citations
- HardFails: Insights into Software-Exploitable Hardware BugsGhada Dessouky, David Gens, Patrick Haney, Garrett Persyn et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 149 citations
- Data Oblivious ISA Extensions for Side Channel-Resistant and High Performance ComputingJiyong Yu, Lucas Hsiung, Mohamad El Hajj, Christopher W. FletcherNDSS 2019 · 106 citations
- Enabling Rack-scale Confidential Computing using Heterogeneous Trusted Execution EnvironmentJianping Zhu, Rui Hou, XiaoFeng Wang, Wenhao Wang et al.S&P 2020 · 95 citations
Builds on5
- Sanctum: Minimal Hardware Extensions for Strong Software IsolationVictor Costan, Ilia A. Lebedev, Srinivas DevadasUSENIX Security 2016 · 649 citations
- Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted ProcessorsOlga Ohrimenko, Felix Schuster, Cédric Fournet, Aastha Mehta et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 594 citations
- Inferring Fine-grained Control Flow Inside SGX Enclaves with Branch ShadowingSangho Lee, Ming-Wei Shih, Prasun Gera, Taesoo Kim et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 536 citations
- T-SGX: Eradicating Controlled-Channel Attacks Against Enclave ProgramsMing-Wei Shih, Sangho Lee, Taesoo Kim, Marcus PeinadoNDSS 2017 · 431 citations
- SGX-Shield: Enabling Address Space Layout Randomization for SGX ProgramsJaebaek Seo, Byoungyoung Lee, Seong-Min Kim, Ming-Wei Shih et al.NDSS 2017 · 227 citations
Related papers
- Cerberus: A Formal Approach to Secure and Efficient Enclave Memory SharingDayeol Lee, Kevin Cheang, Alexander Thomas, Catherine Lu et al.CCS 2022 · 11 citations
- OPERA: Open Remote Attestation for Intel's Secure EnclavesGuoxing Chen, Yinqian Zhang, Ten-Hwang LaiCCS 2019 · 67 citations
- MAGE: Mutual Attestation for a Group of Enclaves without Trusted Third PartiesGuoxing Chen, Yinqian ZhangUSENIX Security 2022
- A Formal Approach to Multi-Layered Privileges for EnclavesGanxiang Yang, Chenyang Liu, Zhen Huang, Guoxing Chen et al.NDSS 2025
- Specification and Verification of Strong Timing Isolation of Hardware EnclavesStella Lau, Thomas Bourgeat, Clément Pit-Claudel, Adam ChlipalaCCS 2024 · 1 citation
