TrustGen: A Platform of Dynamic Benchmarking on the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models
Yue Huang, Chujie Gao, Siyuan Wu, Haoran Wang, Xiangqi Wang, Jiayi Ye, Yujun Zhou, Yanbo Wang, Jiawen Shi, Qihui Zhang, Han Bao, Zhaoyi Liu
Abstract
Generative foundation models (GenFMs), such as large language models and text-to-image systems, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various downstream applications. As they are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications, assessing their trustworthiness has become both a critical necessity and a substantial challenge. Existing evaluation efforts are fragmented, rapidly outdated, and often lack extensibility across modalities. This raises a fundamental question: how can we systematically, reliably, and continuously assess the trustworthiness of rapidly advancing GenFMs across diverse modalities and use cases? To address these gaps, we introduce TrustGen, a dynamic and modular benchmarking system designed to systematically evaluate the trustworthiness of GenFMs across text-to-image, large language, and vision-language modalities. TrustGen standardizes trust evaluation through a unified taxonomy of over 25 fine-grained dimensions—including truthfulness, safety, fairness, robustness, privacy, and machine ethics—while supporting dynamic data generation and adaptive evaluation through three core modules: Metadata Curator, Test Case Builder, and Contextual Variator. Taking TrustGen into action to evaluate the trustworthiness of 39 models reveals four key insights. (1) State-of-the-art GenFMs achieve promising overall trust performance, yet significant limitations remain in specific dimensions such as hallucination resistance, fairness, and privacy preservation. (2) Contrary to prevailing assumptions, open-source models now rival and occasionally surpass proprietary systems in trustworthiness metrics. (3) The trust gap among top-performing models is narrowing, likely due to increased industry convergence on best practices. (4) Trustworthiness is not an isolated property; it interacts complexly with other behaviors, such as helpfulness and ethical decision-making. TrustGen is a transformative step toward standardized, scalable, and actionable trustworthiness evaluation, supporting dynamic assessments across diverse modalities and trust dimensions that evolve alongside the generative AI landscape.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMsNino Scherrer, Claudia Shi, Amir Feder, David M. BleiNeurIPS 2023 · 316 citations
- DALL-EVAL: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation ModelsJaemin Cho, Abhay Zala, Mohit BansalICCV 2023 · 283 citations
- HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie et al.EMNLP 2023 · 224 citations
- SneakyPrompt: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Generative ModelsYuchen Yang, Bo Hui, Haolin Yuan, Neil Gong et al.S&P 2024 · 188 citations
- Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Renliang Sun, Yue Huang, Ming Zhong et al.ICLR 2026 · 150 citations
Related papers
- AudioTrust: Benchmarking The Multifaceted Trustworthiness of Audio Large Language ModelsKai Li, Can Shen, Yile Liu, Jirui Han et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- MMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness and Safety of Multimodal Foundation ModelsChejian Xu, Jiawei Zhang, Zhaorun Chen, Chulin Xie et al.ICLR 2025
- Trustworthy Medical Question Answering: An Evaluation-Centric SurveyYinuo Wang, Baiyang Wang, Robert E. Mercer, Frank Rudzicz et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language ModelsTobias Schreieder, Tim Schopf, Michael FärberACL 2026 · 10 citations
- Red Teaming Large Reasoning ModelsJiawei Chen, Yang Yang, Chao Yu, Yu Tian et al.ACL 2026
