RE-Bench: Evaluating Frontier AI R&D Capabilities of Language Model Agents against Human Experts
Hjalmar Wijk, Tao Roa Lin, Joel Becker, Sami Jawhar, Neev Parikh, Thomas Broadley, Lawrence Chan, Michael Chen, Joshua Clymer, Jai Dhyani, Elena Ericheva, Katharyn Garcia
Abstract
Frontier AI safety policies highlight automation of AI research and development (R&D) by AI agents as an important capability to anticipate. However, there exist few evaluations for AI R&D capabilities, and none that are highly realistic and have a direct comparison to human performance. We introduce v1), which consists of 7 challenging, openended ML research engineering environments and data from 71 8-hour attempts by 61 distinct human experts. We confirm that our experts make progress in the environments given 8 hours, with 82% of expert attempts achieving a non-zero score and 24% matching or exceeding our strong reference solutions. We compare humans to several public frontier models through best-of-k with varying time budgets and agent designs, and find that the best AI agents achieve a score 4× higher than human experts when both are given a total time budget of 2 hours per environment. However, humans currently display better returns to increasing time budgets, narrowly exceeding the top AI agent scores given an 8-hour budget, and achieving 2× the score of the top AI agent when both are given 32 total hours (across different attempts). Qualitatively, we find that modern AI agents possess significant expertise in many ML topics-e.g. an agent wrote a faster custom Triton kernel than any of our human experts'-and can generate and test solutions over ten times faster than humans, at much lower cost. We open-source the evaluation environments, human expert data, analysis code and agent trajectories to facilitate future research. 1 * Qally's. Work done in collaboration with METR. † Ordered alphabetically. ‡ Redwood Research. Work done while at METR. § Independent. Work done in collaboration with METR. ¶ Harvard University. Work done while at METR. 1 Environments can be found at github.com/METR/ai-rd-tasks and agent trajectories can be found at transcripts.metr.org. Analysis code and anonymized human expert data coming soon.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers19
- Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software TasksThomas Kwa, Ben West, Joel Becker, Amy Deng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 160 citations
- AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-benchEdan Toledo, Karen Hambardzumyan, Martin Josifoski, Rishi Hazra et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 71 citations
- EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments?Patrick Tser Jern Kon, Qiuyi Ding, Jiachen Liu, Xinyi Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- NetArena: Dynamic Benchmarks for AI Agents in Network AutomationYajie Zhou, Jiajun Ruan, Eric S. Wang, Sadjad Fouladi et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic TasksTajamul Ashraf, Amal Saqib, Hanan Gani, Muhra AlMahri et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous AgentsShuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,197 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
Related papers
- GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable TasksTejal Patwardhan, Rachel Dias, Elizabeth Proehl, Grace Kim et al.ICLR 2026 · 154 citations
- FrontierCS: Evolving Challenges for Evolving IntelligenceQiuyang Mang, Wenhao Chai, Zhifei Li, Huanzhi Mao et al.ICML 2026
- PostTrainBench: Can LLM Agents Automate LLM Post-Training?Ben Rank, Hardik Bhatnagar, Ameya Pandurang Prabhu, Shira Eisenberg et al.ICML 2026 · 28 citations
- BRIDGE: Predicting Human Task Completion Time From Model PerformanceFengyuan Liu, Jay Gala, Nilaksh, Dzmitry Bahdanau et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- InnovatorBench: Evaluating Agents' Ability to Conduct Innovative AI ResearchYunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Weiye Si, Zhen Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
