Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function
Joshua Meier, Roshan Rao, Robert Verkuil, Jason Liu, Tom Sercu, Alexander Rives
Abstract
Modeling the effect of sequence variation on function is a fundamental problem for understanding and designing proteins. Since evolution encodes information about function into patterns in protein sequences, unsupervised models of variant effects can be learned from sequence data. The approach to date has been to fit a model to a family of related sequences. The conventional setting is limited, since a new model must be trained for each prediction task. We show that using only zero-shot inference, without any supervision from experimental data or additional training, protein language models capture the functional effects of sequence variation, performing at state-of-the-art. In the natural language modeling community, there has been interest in zero-shot transfer of models to new tasks. Massive language models can solve tasks they haven't been directly trained on [9] [10] [11] . Recently protein language models have achieved state-of-the-art in various structure prediction tasks [12] [13] [14] . Work to date has mainly focused on transfer in the classical representation learning setting, using pre-trained features with supervision on the downstream task.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers94
- HyenaDNA: Long-Range Genomic Sequence Modeling at Single Nucleotide ResolutionEric Nguyen, Michael Poli, Marjan Faizi, Armin W. Thomas et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 574 citations
- Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structuresChloe Hsu, Robert Verkuil, Jason Liu, Zeming Lin et al.ICML 2022 · 560 citations
- SaProt: Protein Language Modeling with Structure-aware VocabularyJin Su, Chenchen Han, Yuyang Zhou, Junjie Shan et al.ICLR 2024 · 285 citations
- Tranception: Protein Fitness Prediction with Autoregressive Transformers and Inference-time RetrievalPascal Notin, Mafalda Dias, Jonathan Frazer, Javier Marchena-Hurtado et al.ICML 2022 · 236 citations
- The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelsLucrezia Valeriani, Diego Doimo, Francesca Cuturello, Alessandro Laio et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 148 citations
Builds on4
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learnersRoshan Rao, Joshua Meier, Tom Sercu, Sergey Ovchinnikov et al.ICLR 2021 · 366 citations
- BERTology Meets Biology: Interpreting Attention in Protein Language ModelsJesse Vig, Ali Madani, Lav R. Varshney, Caiming Xiong et al.ICLR 2021 · 357 citations
Related papers
- Protein Language Model Fitness is a Matter of PreferenceCade W. Gordon, Amy X. Lu, Pieter AbbeelICLR 2025
- Evolution-Inspired Loss Functions for Protein Representation LearningChengyue Gong, Adam R. Klivans, James Loy, Tianlong Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Understanding protein function with a multimodal retrieval-augmented foundation modelTimothy F. Truong Jr., Tristan BeplerNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Predicting evolutionary rate as a pretraining task improves genome language model representationsMica Consens, Kevin Yang, James Hall, Ashley Conard et al.ICML 2026
- Metalic: Meta-Learning In-Context with Protein Language ModelsJacob Beck, Shikha Surana, Manus McAuliffe, Oliver Bent et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
