The approximate degree of DNF and CNF formulas
Alexander A. Sherstov
Abstract
The approximate degree of a Boolean function f : 0, 1 n → 0, 1 is the minimum degree of a real polynomial p that approximates f pointwise: |f (x) -p(x)| 1/3 for all x ∈ 0, 1 n . For every δ > 0, we construct CNF and DNF formulas of polynomial size with approximate degree Ω(n 1-δ ), essentially matching the trivial upper bound of n. This improves polynomially on previous lower bounds and fully resolves the approximate degree of constant-depth circuits (AC 0 ), a question that has seen extensive research over the past 10 years. Prior to our work, an Ω(n 1-δ ) lower bound was known only for AC 0 circuits of depth that grows with 1/δ (Bun and Thaler, FOCS 2017). Furthermore, the CNF and DNF formulas that we construct are the simplest possible in that they have constant width. Our result holds even for one-sided approximation: for any δ > 0, we construct a polynomial-size constant-width CNF formula with one-sided approximate degree Ω(n 1-δ ).
Our work has the following consequences. (i) We essentially settle the communication complexity of AC 0 circuits in the bounded-error quantum model, k-party number-on-the-forehead randomized model, and k-party number-on-the-forehead nondeterministic model: we prove that for every δ > 0, these models require Ω(n 1-δ ), Ω(n/4 k k 2 ) 1-δ , and Ω(n/4 k k 2 ) 1-δ , respectively, bits of communication even for polynomial-size constant-width CNF formulas. (ii) In particular, we show that the multiparty communication class coNP k can be separated essentially optimally from NP k and BPP k by a particularly simple function, a polynomial-size constant-width CNF formula. (iii) We give an essentially tight separation, of O(1) versus Ω(n 1-δ ), for the one-sided versus two-sided approximate degree of a function; and O(1) versus Ω(n 1-δ ) for the one-sided approximate degree of a function f versus its negation ¬f .
Our proof departs significantly from previous approaches and contributes a novel, number-theoretic method for amplifying approximate degree.
- This manuscript is a much-expanded version of the STOC '22 paper, with several new results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa6957e6-65e1-4e97-932d-156538100e69Related papers
- On the Computational Power of QAC0 with Barely Superlinear AncillaeAnurag Anshu, Yangjing Dong, Fengning Ou, Penghui YaoSTOC 2025 · 19 citations
- An optimal separation of randomized and Quantum query complexityAlexander A. Sherstov, Andrey A. Storozhenko, Pei WuSTOC 2021 · 10 citations
- Depth-d Threshold Circuits vs. Depth-(d+1) AND-OR TreesPooya Hatami, William M. Hoza, Avishay Tal, Roei TellSTOC 2023 · 2 citations
- Degree vs. approximate degree and Quantum implications of Huang's sensitivity theoremScott Aaronson, Shalev Ben-David, Robin Kothari, Shravas Rao et al.STOC 2021 · 6 citations
- Improved Lower Bounds for QAC0Malvika Raj Joshi, Avishay Tal, Francisca Vasconcelos, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
