A framework for quadratic form maximization over convex sets through nonconvex relaxations
Vijay Bhattiprolu, Euiwoong Lee, Assaf Naor
Abstract
We investigate the approximability of the following optimization problem. The input is an ๐ ร ๐ matrix ๐ด = (๐ด ๐ ๐ ) with real entries and an origin-symmetric convex body ๐พ โ R ๐ that is given by a membership oracle. The task is to compute (or approximate) the maximum of the quadratic form ๐ ๐=1 ๐ ๐=1 ๐ด ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ = โจ๐ฅ, ๐ด๐ฅโฉ as ๐ฅ ranges over ๐พ. This is a rich and expressive family of optimization problems; for different choices of matrices ๐ด and convex bodies ๐พ it includes a diverse range of optimization problems like max-cut, Grothendieck/non-commutative Grothendieck inequalities, small set expansion and more. While the literature studied these special cases using case-specific reasoning, here we develop a general methodology for treatment of the approximability and inapproximability aspects of these questions.
The underlying geometry of ๐พ plays a critical role; we show under commonly used complexity assumptions that polytime constantapproximability necessitates that ๐พ has type-2 constant that grows slowly with ๐. However, we show that even when the type-2 constant is bounded, this problem sometimes exhibits strong hardness of approximation. Thus, even within the realm of type-2 bodies, the approximability landscape is nuanced and subtle.
However, the link that we establish between optimization and geometry of Banach spaces allows us to devise a generic algorithmic approach to the above problem. We associate to each convex body a new (higher dimensional) auxiliary set that is not convex, but is approximately convex when ๐พ has a bounded type-2 constant. If our auxiliary set has an approximate separation oracle, then we design an approximation algorithm for the original quadratic optimization problem, using an approximate version of the ellipsoid method. Even though our hardness result implies that such an oracle does not exist in general, this new question can be solved in specific cases of interest by implementing a range of classical tools from functional analysis, most notably the deep factorization theory of linear operators.
Beyond encompassing the scenarios in the literature for which constant-factor approximation algorithms were found, our generic framework implies that that for convex sets with bounded type-2
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Non-Euclidean Gradient Descent Operates at the Edge of StabilityRustem Islamov, Michael Crawshaw, Jeremy Cohen, Robert GowerICML 2026 ยท 5 citations
- Inapproximability of Finding Sparse Vectors in Codes, Subspaces, and LatticesVijay Bhattiprolu, Venkatesan Guruswami, Euiwoong Lee, Xuandi RenFOCS 2025 ยท 1 citation
- Approximating Small Sparse CutsAditya Anand, Euiwoong Lee, Jason Li, Thatchaphol SaranurakSTOC 2024 ยท 1 citation
Related papers
- A PTAS for โ0-Low Rank Approximation: Solving Dense CSPs over RealsVincent Cohen-Addad, Chenglin Fan, Suprovat Ghoshal, Euiwoong Lee et al.SODA 2024
- Faster Algorithms for Structured John Ellipsoid ComputationYang Cao, Xiaoyu Li, Zhao Song, Xin Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 ยท 33 citations
- Sublinear Classical and Quantum Algorithms for General Matrix GamesTongyang Li, Chunhao Wang, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Xiaodi WuAAAI 2021 ยท 20 citations
- Combinatorial Optimization using Comparison OraclesVincent Cohen-Addad, Tommaso d'Orsi, Anupam Gupta, Guru Guruganesh et al.STOC 2026 ยท 2 citations
- Reducing isotropy and volume to KLS: an o*(n3ฯ2) volume algorithmHe Jia, Aditi Laddha, Yin Tat Lee, Santosh S. VempalaSTOC 2021 ยท 12 citations
