A Probability-Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling Adaptors

The relationship between the quality of a string, as judged by a human reader, and its probability, p(y) under a language model undergirds the development of better language models. For example, many popular algorithms for sampling from a language model have been conceived with the goal of manipulating p(y) to place higher probability on strings that humans deem of high quality (Fan et al., 2018; Holtzman et al., 2020) . In this article, we examine the probability-quality relationship in language models explicitly aligned to human preferences, e.g., through reinforcement learning through human feedback. We show that, when sampling corpora from an aligned language model, there exists a trade-off between the strings' average reward and average log-likelihood under the prior language model, i.e., the same model before alignment with human preferences. We provide a formal treatment of this phenomenon and demonstrate how a choice of sampling adaptor allows for a selection of how much likelihood we exchange for the reward. https://github.com/tanyjnaaman/ probability-quality-paradox