AAAI2026
Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Video-based MLLMs: A Cross-modal Image-to-Video Approach
Linhao Huang, Xue Jiang, Zhiqiang Wang, Wentao Mo, Xi Xiao, Yongjie Yin, Bo Han, Feng Zheng
6 citations
Abstract
Video-based multimodal large language models (V-MLLMs) have shown vulnerability to adversarial examples in videotext multimodal tasks. However, the transferability of adversarial videos to unseen models-a common and practical real-world scenario-remains unexplored. In this paper, we pioneer an investigation into the transferability of adversarial video samples across V-MLLMs. We find that existing adversarial attack methods face significant limitations when applied in black-box settings for V-MLLMs, which we attribute to the following shortcomings: (1) lacking generalization in perturbing video features, (2) focusing only on sparse keyframes, and (3) failing to integrate multimodal information. To address these limitations and deepen the understanding of V-MLLM vulnerabilities in black-box scenarios, we introduce the Image-to-Video MLLM (I2V-MLLM) attack. In I2V-MLLM, we utilize an image-based multimodal large language model (I-MLLM) as a surrogate model to craft adversarial video samples. Multimodal interactions and spatiotemporal information are integrated to disrupt video representations within the latent space, improving adversarial transferability. Additionally, a perturbation propagation technique is introduced to handle different unknown frame sampling strategies. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can generate adversarial examples that exhibit strong transferability across different V-MLLMs on multiple video-text multimodal tasks. Compared to white-box attacks on these models, our black-box attacks (using BLIP-2 as a surrogate model) achieve competitive performance, with average attack success rate (AASR) of 57.98% on MSVD-QA and 58.26% on MSRVTT-QA for Zero-Shot VideoQA tasks, respectively. Recent work has shown that video-based multimodal large language models (V-MLLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial video samples (Li et al. 2024a), even though they have * Equal contribution.