Provably (More) Sample-Efficient Offline RL with Options
Xiaoyan Hu, Ho-fung Leung
Abstract
The options framework yields empirical success in long-horizon planning problems of reinforcement learning (RL). Recent works show that options improves the sample efficiency in online RL where the learner can actively explores the environment. However, these results are no longer applicable to scenarios where exploring the environment online is risky, e.g., automated driving and healthcare. In this paper, we provide the first analysis of the sample complexity for offline RL with options, where the agent learns from a dataset without further interaction with the environment. We propose the PE ssimistic V alue I teration for Learning with O ptions (PEVIO) algorithm and establish near-optimal suboptimality bounds (with respect to the novel information-theoretic lower bound for offline RL with options) for two popular data-collection procedures, where the first one collects state-option transitions and the second one collects state-action transitions. We show that compared to offline RL with actions, using options not only enjoys a faster finite-time convergence rate (to the optimal value) but also attains a better performance (when either the options are carefully designed or the offline data is limited). Based on these results, we analyze the pros and cons of the data-collection procedures, which may facilitate the selection in practice.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 854732ac-94c5-4be6-92a4-d749f86cdbc5Builds on14
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy OptimizationQi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Chi Jin, Zhaoran WangICML 2020 · 304 citations
- Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 207 citations
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
Related papers
- Preference Elicitation for Offline Reinforcement LearningAlizée Pace, Bernhard Schölkopf, Gunnar Rätsch, Giorgia RamponiICLR 2025
- Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with PessimismMing Yin, Yu-Xiang WangNeurIPS 2021 · 93 citations
- Provably Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning with Perturbed Data SourcesChengshuai Shi, Wei Xiong, Cong Shen, Jing YangICML 2023 · 5 citations
- Pessimism in the Face of Confounders: Provably Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Markov Decision ProcessesMiao Lu, Yifei Min, Zhaoran Wang, Zhuoran YangICLR 2023
- Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance ReductionMing Yin, Yu Bai, Yu-Xiang WangNeurIPS 2021 · 72 citations
