Policy Finetuning in Reinforcement Learning via Design of Experiments using Offline Data
Ruiqi Zhang, Andrea Zanette
Abstract
In some applications of reinforcement learning, a dataset of pre-collected experience is already available but it is also possible to acquire some additional online data to help improve the quality of the policy. However, it may be preferable to gather additional data with a single, non-reactive exploration policy and avoid the engineering costs associated with switching policies. In this paper we propose an algorithm with provable guarantees that can leverage an offline dataset to design a single non-reactive policy for exploration. We theoretically analyze the algorithm and measure the quality of the final policy as a function of the local coverage of the original dataset and the amount of additional data collected. Related Work In this section we discuss some related literature. Our work is related to low-switching algorithms, but unlike those, we focus on the limit case where no-switiches are allowed. For more related work about low-switching algorithms, offline RL, task-agnostic RL, and reward-free RL we refer to Appendix F. Low -switching RL In reinforcement learning, [Bai et al., 2019] first proposed Q-learning with UCB2 exploration, proving an O(H 3 |S| |A| log K) switching cost. This was later improved by a factor of H by the UCBadvantage algorithm in [Zhang et al., 2020b]. Recently, [Qiao et al., 2022] generalized the policy elimination algorithm from [Cesa-Bianchi et al., 2013] and introduced APEVE, which attains an optimal O(H |S| |A| log log K) switching cost. The reward-free version of their algorithm (which is not regret minimizing) has an O(H |S| |A|) switching cost. Similar ideas were soon applied in RL with linear function approximation [Gao et al., 2021, Wang et al., 2021, Qiao and Wang, 2022] and general function approximation [Qiao et al., 2023]. Additionally, numerous research efforts have focused on low-adaptivity in other learning domains, such as batched dueling bandits [Agarwal et al., 2022], batched convex optimization [Duchi et al., 2018], linear contextual bandits [Ruan et al., 2021], and deployment-efficient RL [Huang et al., 2022]. Our work was inspired by the problem of non-reactive policy design in linear contextual bandits. Given access to an offline dataset, [Zanette et al., 2021a] proposed an algorithm to output a single exploratory policy, which generates a dataset from which a near-optimal policy can be extracted. However, there are a number of additional challenges which arise in reinforcement learning, including the fact that the state space is only partially explored in the offline dataset. In fact, in reinforcement learning, [Xiao et al., 2022] established an exponential lower bound for any non-adaptive policy learning algorithm starting from tabula rasa. Setup Throughout this paper, we let [n] = 1, 2, ..., n. We adopt the big-O notation, where O(•) suppresses poly-log factors of the input parameters. We indicate the cardinality of a set X with |X |. Let us define the comparator policy π † * used for the comparison in eq. ( 5 .2) to be the (deterministic) policy with the highest value function on the sparsified MDP: π † * := arg max π∈Π V 1 (s 1 ; P † , r † , π). We can bound the suboptimality using the triangle inequality as
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 82b1049f-851f-45dc-a2a5-0028137d9f09Cited by top-tier papers6
- Hybrid Reinforcement Learning from Offline Observation AloneYuda Song, Drew Bagnell, Aarti SinghICML 2024 · 6 citations
- OLLIE: Imitation Learning from Offline Pretraining to Online FinetuningSheng Yue, Xingyuan Hua, Ju Ren, Sen Lin et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-Play under Adaptivity ConstraintsDan Qiao, Yu-Xiang WangICML 2024 · 5 citations
- On The Statistical Complexity of Offline Decision-MakingThanh Nguyen-Tang, Raman AroraICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Sample-Efficiency in Multi-Batch Reinforcement Learning: The Need for Dimension-Dependent AdaptivityEmmeran Johnson, Ciara Pike-Burke, Patrick RebeschiniICLR 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on26
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement LearningChi Jin, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Max Simchowitz, Tiancheng YuICML 2020 · 226 citations
- Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningvia Reference-Advantage DecompositionZihan Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Xiangyang JiNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial CoverageMasatoshi Uehara, Wen SunICLR 2022 · 176 citations
Related papers
- Reward-agnostic Fine-tuning: Provable Statistical Benefits of Hybrid Reinforcement LearningGen Li, Wenhao Zhan, Jason D. Lee, Yuejie Chi et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Breaks Sample Size Barriers In Linear MDPsKevin Tan, Wei Fan, Yuting WeiNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- VIPeR: Provably Efficient Algorithm for Offline RL with Neural Function ApproximationThanh Nguyen-Tang, Raman AroraICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 207 citations
- Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with loglog(T) Switching CostDan Qiao, Ming Yin, Ming Min, Yu-Xiang WangICML 2022 · 35 citations
