The limits of pan privacy and shuffle privacy for learning and estimation
Albert Cheu, Jonathan R. Ullman
Abstract
There has been a recent wave of interest in intermediate trust models for di erential privacy that eliminate the need for a fully trusted central data collector, but overcome the limitations of local di erential privacy. This interest has led to the introduction of the shu e model (Cheu et al., EUROCRYPT 2019; Erlingsson et al., SODA 2019) and revisiting the pan-private model (Dwork et al., ITCS 2010). The message of this line of work is that, for a variety of low-dimensional problemssuch as counts, means, and histograms-these intermediate models o er nearly as much power as central di erential privacy. However, there has been considerably less success using these models for high-dimensional learning and estimation problems. In this work we prove the rst non-trivial lower bounds for high-dimensional learning and estimation in both the pan-private model and the general multi-message shu e model. Our lower bounds apply to a variety of problems-for example, we show that, private agnostic learning of parity functions over 𝑑 bits requires Ω(2 𝑑/2 ) samples in these models, and privately selecting the most common attribute from a set of 𝑑 choices requires Ω(𝑑 1/2 ) samples, both of which are exponential separations from the central model. Our work gives the rst non-trivial lower bounds for learning and optimization in both the pan-private and the general multi-message shu e model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Optimal Algorithms for Mean Estimation under Local Differential PrivacyHilal Asi, Vitaly Feldman, Kunal TalwarICML 2022 · 53 citations
- When is memorization of irrelevant training data necessary for high-accuracy learning?Gavin Brown, Mark Bun, Vitaly Feldman, Adam D. Smith et al.STOC 2021 · 33 citations
- Private Vector Mean Estimation in the Shuffle Model: Optimal Rates Require Many MessagesHilal Asi, Vitaly Feldman, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Differentially Private Selection from Secure Distributed ComputingIvan Damgård, Hannah Keller, Boel Nelson, Claudio Orlandi et al.WWW 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on2
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
- Private Aggregation from Fewer Anonymous MessagesBadih Ghazi, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh, Ameya VelingkerEUROCRYPT 2020 · 45 citations
Related papers
- On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages: Frequency Estimation and Selection in the Shuffle Model of Differential PrivacyBadih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Rasmus Pagh et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 34 citations
- The power of factorization mechanisms in local and central differential privacyAlexander Edmonds, Aleksandar Nikolov, Jonathan R. UllmanSTOC 2020
- Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy ModelsBadih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2022 · 6 citations
- Private estimation algorithms for stochastic block models and mixture modelsHongjie Chen, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Tommaso d'Orsi, Alessandro Epasto et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
