The Dark Side of AutoML: Towards Architectural Backdoor Search
Ren Pang, Changjiang Li, Zhaohan Xi, Shouling Ji, Ting Wang
Abstract
This paper asks the intriguing question: is it possible to exploit neural architecture search (NAS) as a new attack vector to launch previously improbable attacks? Specifically, we present EVAS, a new attack that leverages NAS to find neural architectures with inherent backdoors and exploits such vulnerability using input-aware triggers. Compared with existing attacks, EVAS demonstrates many interesting properties: (i) it does not require polluting training data or perturbing model parameters; (ii) it is agnostic to downstream fine-tuning or even re-training from scratch; (iii) it naturally evades defenses that rely on inspecting model parameters or training data. With extensive evaluation on benchmark datasets, we show that EVAS features high evasiveness, transferability, and robustness, thereby expanding the adversary's design spectrum. We further characterize the mechanisms underlying EVAS, which are possibly explainable by architecture-level "shortcuts" that recognize trigger patterns. This work showcases that NAS can be exploited in a harmful way to find architectures with inherent backdoor vulnerability. The code is available at https://github.com/ain-soph/nas_backdoor . EVAS Next, we present EVAS, a new backdoor attack leveraging NAS to find neural arches with exploitable vulnerability. We begin by introducing the threat model. THREAT MODEL A backdoor attack injects a hidden malicious function ("backdoor") into a target model (Pang et al., 2022). The backdoor is activated once a pre-defined condition ("trigger") is present, while the model
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7af868f2-74f0-4b4b-b245-5bc0103933e1Cited by top-tier papers3
- An Embarrassingly Simple Backdoor Attack on Self-supervised LearningChangjiang Li, Ren Pang, Zhaohan Xi, Tianyu Du et al.ICCV 2023 · 54 citations
- Watch the Watchers! On the Security Risks of Robustness-Enhancing Diffusion ModelsChangjiang Li, Ren Pang, Bochuan Cao, Jinghui Chen et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Exploiting Leaderboards for Large-Scale Distribution of Malicious ModelsAnshuman Suri, Harsh Chaudhari, Yuefeng Peng, Ali Naseh et al.S&P 2026
Builds on19
- Neural Cleanse: Identifying and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Neural NetworksBolun Wang, Yuanshun Yao, Shawn Shan, Huiying Li et al.S&P 2019 · 1,801 citations
- Trojaning Attack on Neural NetworksYingqi Liu, Shiqing Ma, Yousra Aafer, Wen-Chuan Lee et al.NDSS 2018 · 1,377 citations
- NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture SearchXuanyi Dong, Yi YangICLR 2020 · 825 citations
- Progressive Differentiable Architecture Search: Bridging the Depth Gap Between Search and EvaluationXin Chen, Lingxi Xie, Jun Wu, Qi TianICCV 2019 · 725 citations
- Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor AttackTuan Anh Nguyen, Anh Tuan TranNeurIPS 2020 · 601 citations
Related papers
- On the Security Risks of AutoMLRen Pang, Zhaohan Xi, Shouling Ji, Xiapu Luo et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Architectural Backdoors in Neural NetworksMikel Bober-Irizar, Ilia Shumailov, Yiren Zhao, Robert Mullins et al.CVPR 2023
- ArchLock: Locking DNN Transferability at the Architecture Level with a Zero-Cost Binary PredictorTong Zhou, Shaolei Ren, Xiaolin XuICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- ATTEQ-NN: Attention-based QoE-aware Evasive Backdoor AttacksXueluan Gong, Yanjiao Chen, Jianshuo Dong, Qian WangNDSS 2022
- BadPre: Task-agnostic Backdoor Attacks to Pre-trained NLP Foundation ModelsKangjie Chen, Yuxian Meng, Xiaofei Sun, Shangwei Guo et al.ICLR 2022 · 133 citations
