Proving the Limited Scalability of Centralized Distributed Optimization via a New Lower Bound Construction
Alexander Tyurin
Abstract
We consider centralized distributed optimization in the classical federated learning setup, where workers jointly find an -stationary point of an -smooth, -dimensional nonconvex function , having access only to unbiased stochastic gradients with variance . Each worker requires at most seconds to compute a stochastic gradient, and the communication times from the server to the workers and from the workers to the server are and seconds per coordinate, respectively. One of the main motivations for distributed optimization is to achieve scalability with respect to . For instance, it is well known that the distributed version of SGD has a variance-dependent runtime term which improves with the number of workers where and is the starting point. Similarly, using unbiased sparsification compressors, it is possible to reduce both the variance-dependent runtime term and the communication runtime term from to which also benefits from increasing However, once we account for the communication from the server to the workers , we prove that it becomes infeasible to design a method using unbiased random sparsification compressors that scales both the server-side communication runtime term and the variance-dependent runtime term better than poly-logarithmically in , even in the homogeneous (i.i.d.) case, where all workers access the same function or distribution. Indeed, when our lower bound is To establish this result, we construct a new ``worst-case'' function and develop a new lower bound framework that reduces the analysis to the concentration of a random sum, for which we prove a concentration bound. These results reveal fundamental limitations in scaling distributed optimization, even under the homogeneous (i.i.d.) assumption.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?Blake E. Woodworth, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Sebastian U. Stich, Zhen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 277 citations
- A variegated look at 5G in the wild: performance, power, and QoE implicationsArvind Narayanan, Xumiao Zhang, Ruiyang Zhu, Ahmad Hassan et al.SIGCOMM 2021 · 259 citations
- Acceleration for Compressed Gradient Descent in Distributed and Federated OptimizationZhize Li, Dmitry Kovalev, Xun Qian, Peter RichtárikICML 2020 · 156 citations
- MARINA: Faster Non-Convex Distributed Learning with CompressionEduard Gorbunov, Konstantin Burlachenko, Zhize Li, Peter RichtárikICML 2021 · 129 citations
Related papers
- Shadowheart SGD: Distributed Asynchronous SGD with Optimal Time Complexity Under Arbitrary Computation and Communication HeterogeneityAlexander Tyurin, Marta Pozzi, Ivan Ilin, Peter RichtárikNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- EF21-P and Friends: Improved Theoretical Communication Complexity for Distributed Optimization with Bidirectional CompressionKaja Gruntkowska, Alexander Tyurin, Peter RichtárikICML 2023 · 35 citations
- Sharper Convergence Guarantees for Asynchronous SGD for Distributed and Federated LearningAnastasia Koloskova, Sebastian U. Stich, Martin JaggiNeurIPS 2022 · 131 citations
- Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization Robust to Arbitrary DelaysAlon Cohen, Amit Daniely, Yoel Drori, Tomer Koren et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 46 citations
- Faster Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Delays via Adaptive Asynchronous Mini-BatchingAmit Attia, Ofir Gaash, Tomer KorenICML 2025
