Dimension-Free Decision Calibration for Nonlinear Loss Functions
Jingwu Tang, Jiayun Wu, Steven Z. Wu, Jiahao Zhang
Abstract
When model predictions inform downstream decision making, a natural question is under what conditions can the decision-makers simply respond to the predictions as if they were the true outcomes. Calibration-a classical statistical notion that requires the predictions to be unbiased conditional on the prediction values-suffices to guarantee that simple best-response to predictions is optimal. However, for high-dimensional prediction outcome spaces, obtaining an accurate calibrated predictor requires exponential computational and statistical complexity. The recent relaxation known as decision calibration [Zhao et al., 2021] circumvents this curse of dimensionality, as it only requires predictions to be unbiased conditional on the induced best-response actions-in effect ensuring the optimality of the simple best-response rule while requiring only polynomial sample complexity in the dimension of outcomes. However, known results on calibration and decision calibration crucially rely on linear loss functions for establishing best-response optimality. A natural approach to handle nonlinear losses is to map outcomes y into a feature space φ(y) of dimension m, then approximate losses with linear functions of φ(y). Unfortunately, even simple classes of nonlinear functions can demand exponentially large or infinite (e.g., RKHS-induced) feature dimensions m. A key open problem is whether it is possible to achieve decision calibration with sample complexity independent of m. We begin with a negative result: even verifying decision calibration under standard deterministic best response inherently requires sample complexity polynomial in m. Motivated by this lower bound, we investigate a smooth version of decision calibration in which decision-makers follow a smooth best-response-also known as the quantal response. This smooth relaxation enables dimension-free decision calibration algorithms. We introduce algorithms that, given poly(|A|, 1/ǫ) samples and any initial predictor p, can efficiently (1) determine if a predictor is decisioncalibrated, and (2) post-process the initial predictor to satisfy decision calibration without worsening accuracy. Our algorithms apply broadly to function classes that can be well-approximated by boundednorm functions in (possibly infinite-dimensional) separable RKHS; examples of such classes include piecewise linear loss functions and d-dimensional Cobb-Douglas loss functions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6571997e-e302-451a-b150-8c4a6e90894dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class CalibrationShengjia Zhao, Michael P. Kim, Roshni Sahoo, Tengyu Ma et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 96 citations
- Near-Optimal Algorithms for OmnipredictionPrincewill Okoroafor, Robert Kleinberg, Michael P. KimFOCS 2025 · 37 citations
- Calibrated Stackelberg Games: Learning Optimal Commitments Against Calibrated AgentsNika Haghtalab, Chara Podimata, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Outcome indistinguishabilityCynthia Dwork, Michael P. Kim, Omer Reingold, Guy N. Rothblum et al.STOC 2021 · 24 citations
- Optimal Multiclass U-Calibration Error and BeyondHaipeng Luo, Spandan Senapati, Vatsal SharanNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Calibration for Decision MakingParikshit Gopalan, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Kunal Talwar, Pranay TankalaSTOC 2026 · 3 citations
- Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded TasksLunjia Hu, Yifan WuFOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Robust Decision-Making with Partially Calibrated ForecastersShayan Kiyani, Hamed Hassani, George J. Pappas, Aaron RothICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Reconciling Model Multiplicity for Downstream Decision MakingAlly Yalei Du, Dung Daniel T. Ngo, Zhiwei Steven WuICLR 2025
- Testing Calibration in Nearly-Linear TimeLunjia Hu, Arun Jambulapati, Kevin Tian, Chutong YangNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
