A Fair Bayesian Inference through Matched Gibbs Posterior
Jihu Lee, Kunwoong Kim, Sehyun Park, Insung Kong, Dongyoon Yang, Yongdai Kim
Abstract
With the growing importance of trustworthy AI, algorithmic fairness has emerged as a critical concern. Among various fairness notions, group fairness - which measures the model bias between sensitive groups - has received significant attention. While many group-fair models have focused on satisfying group fairness constraints, model uncertainty has received relatively little attention, despite its importance for robust and trustworthy decision-making. To address this, we adopt a Bayesian framework to capture model uncertainty in fair model training. We first define group-fair posterior distributions and then introduce a fair variational Bayesian inference. Then we propose a novel distribution termed matched Gibbs posterior, as a proxy distribution for the fair variational Bayesian inference by employing a new group fairness measure, the matched deviation. A notable feature of matched Gibbs posterior is that it approximates the posterior distribution well under the fairness constraint without requiring heavy computation. Theoretically, we show that the matched deviation has a strong relation to existing group fairness measures, highlighting desirable fairness guarantees. Computationally, by treating the matching function in the matched deviation as a learnable parameter, we develop an efficient MCMC algorithm. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrates that matched Gibbs posterior outperforms other methods in balancing uncertainty–fairness and utility–fairness trade-offs, while also offering additional desirable properties.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Fair regression with Wasserstein barycentersEvgenii Chzhen, Christophe Denis, Mohamed Hebiri, Luca Oneto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 148 citations
- Training individually fair ML models with sensitive subspace robustnessMikhail Yurochkin, Amanda Bower, Yuekai SunICLR 2020 · 123 citations
- A General Approach to Fairness with Optimal TransportSilvia Chiappa, Ray Jiang, Tom Stepleton, Aldo Pacchiano et al.AAAI 2020 · 94 citations
Related papers
- Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian InferenceDisi Ji, Padhraic Smyth, Mark SteyversNeurIPS 2020 · 57 citations
- Fair Bayesian Data Selection via Generalized Discrepancy MeasuresYixuan Zhang, Jiabin Luo, Zhenggang Wang, Feng Zhou et al.AAAI 2026
- Towards Harmless Rawlsian Fairness Regardless of Demographic PriorXuanqian Wang, Jing Li, Ivor W. Tsang, Yew Soon OngNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Fair Class-Incremental Learning using Sample WeightingJaeyoung Park, Minsu Kim, Steven Euijong WhangKDD 2026
- Conformal Classification with Equalized Coverage for Adaptively Selected GroupsYanfei Zhou, Matteo SesiaNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
