On the Convergence and Sample Complexity Analysis of Deep Q-Networks with ε-Greedy Exploration
Shuai Zhang, Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Miao Liu, Pin-Yu Chen, Songtao Lu, Sijia Liu, Keerthiram Murugesan, Subhajit Chaudhury
Abstract
This paper provides a theoretical understanding of Deep Q-Network (DQN) with the ε-greedy exploration in deep reinforcement learning. Despite the tremendous empirical achievement of the DQN, its theoretical characterization remains underexplored. First, the exploration strategy is either impractical or ignored in the existing analysis. Second, in contrast to conventional Q-learning algorithms, the DQN employs the target network and experience replay to acquire an unbiased estimation of the mean-square Bellman error (MSBE) utilized in training the Qnetwork. However, the existing theoretical analysis of DQNs lacks convergence analysis or bypasses the technical challenges by deploying a significantly overparameterized neural network, which is not computationally efficient. This paper provides the first theoretical convergence and sample complexity analysis of the practical setting of DQNs with ε-greedy policy. We prove an iterative procedure with decaying ε converges to the optimal Q-value function geometrically. Moreover, a higher level of ε values enlarges the region of convergence but slows down the convergence, while the opposite holds for a lower level of ε values. Experiments justify our established theoretical insights on DQNs. 2 Related Works. Q-learning with linear function approximation. In the setting of linear function approximation, the Q-function is assumed to be a linear function of either the feature mapping [83, 32, 92] or a mixture of some basis kernels [91, 52] . Early works mainly focus on the algorithm design [6, 48, 2] and convergence analysis [38, 47, 67, 14, 69] but lacks theoretical guarantees with polynomial sample complexity. Assuming the underlying Q-function can be exactly represented as a linear function of the feature mapping with some unknown parameters, several sample-efficient algorithms are proposed to find the ground-truth mapping with finite-sample guarantee [11, 80] , and the sample complexity depends linearly on the feature dimension [80] .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 54b9baaa-71d4-4a04-abb0-5c5d273bbbb1Cited by top-tier papers6
- How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning?Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui et al.ICML 2024 · 37 citations
- What Improves the Generalization of Graph Transformers? A Theoretical Dive into the Self-attention and Positional EncodingHongkang Li, Meng Wang, Tengfei Ma, Sijia Liu et al.ICML 2024 · 23 citations
- A Provably Effective Method for Pruning Experts in Fine-tuned Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsMohammed Nowaz Rabbani Chowdhury, Meng Wang, Kaoutar El Maghraoui, Naigang Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Defogger: A Visual Analysis Approach for Data Exploration of Sensitive Data Protected by Differential PrivacyXumeng Wang, Shuangcheng Jiao, Chris BryanIEEE VIS 2024 · 3 citations
- How Can Mamba Learn In Context with Outliers and Generalize Provably?Hongkang Li, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on22
- Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient AlgorithmsChi Jin, Qinghua Liu, Sobhan MiryoosefiNeurIPS 2021 · 264 citations
- Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman ErrorAndrea Zanette, Alessandro Lazaric, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 238 citations
- Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive LearningZixin Wen, Yuanzhi LiICML 2021 · 162 citations
- Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function ApproximationYaqi Duan, Zeyu Jia, Mengdi WangICML 2020 · 161 citations
- Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance ReductionGen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Deep Neural Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning via -Greedy ExplorationFanghui Liu, Luca Viano, Volkan CevherNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
- A Finite-Time Analysis of Q-Learning with Neural Network Function ApproximationPan Xu, Quanquan GuICML 2020 · 79 citations
- On the Global Convergence of Fitted Q-Iteration with Two-layer Neural Network ParametrizationMudit Gaur, Vaneet Aggarwal, Mridul AgarwalICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provable Efficient LearningAndrea Zanette, Martin J. WainwrightICML 2022 · 5 citations
- Online Target Q-learning with Reverse Experience Replay: Efficiently finding the Optimal Policy for Linear MDPsNaman Agarwal, Syomantak Chaudhuri, Prateek Jain, Dheeraj Mysore Nagaraj et al.ICLR 2022 · 24 citations
