An Empirical Study of Proxy Contracts at the Ethereum Ecosystem Scale
Mengya Zhang, Preksha Shukla, Wuqi Zhang, Zhuo Zhang, Pranav Agrawal, Zhiqiang Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Xiaokuan Zhang
Abstract
The proxy design pattern separates data and code in smart contracts into proxy and logic contracts. Data resides in proxy contracts, while code is sourced from logic contracts. This pattern allows for flexible smart contract development, enabling upgradeability, extensibility, and code reuse. Despite its popularity and importance, there is currently no systematic study to understand the prevalence, use scenarios, and development pitfalls of proxies. We present the first comprehensive study on Ethereum proxies. To gather a dataset of proxies, we introduce PROXYEX, the first framework to detect proxies from bytecode, achieving over 99% accuracy. Using PROXYEX, we collected a dataset of 2,031,422 Ethereum proxies and conducted the first large-scale empirical study. We analyzed proxy numbers and transaction traffic to understand their current status on Ethereum. We identified four proxy use patterns: upgradeability, extensibility, code-sharing, and code-hiding. We also pinpointed three common issues: proxy-logic storage collision, logic-logic storage collision, and uninitialized contracts, creating checkers for these by replaying historical transactions. Our study reveals that upgradeability isn't the sole reason for proxy adoption in DApps, and many proxies present issues like storage collisions and uninitialized contracts, which enhances the understanding of proxies and guide future smart contract research on the development, usage, quality assurance, and bug detection of proxies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 37b3a719-82b5-4f02-9eb0-026ccd33e48fCited by top-tier papers2
- Precise Static Identification of Ethereum Storage VariablesSifis Lagouvardos, Yannis Bollanos, Michael Debono, Neville Grech et al.ICSE 2026 · 2 citations
- The Incredible Shrinking Context... in a Decompiler Near YouSifis Lagouvardos, Yannis Bollanos, Neville Grech, Yannis SmaragdakisISSTA 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on24
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
- Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Arthur GervaisS&P 2022 · 336 citations
Related papers
- Characterizing Ethereum Upgradable Smart Contracts and Their Security ImplicationsXiaofan Li, Jin Yang, Jiaqi Chen, Yuzhe Tang et al.WWW 2024 · 23 citations
- CollisionRepair: First-Aid and Automated Patching for Storage Collision Vulnerabilities in Smart ContractsYu Pan, Wanjing Han, Yue Duan, Mu ZhangUSENIX Security 2025
- Clone Detection for Smart Contracts: How Far Are We?Zuobin Wang, Zhiyuan Wan, Yujing Chen, Yun Zhang et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Code Cloning in Solidity Smart Contracts: Prevalence, Evolution, and Impact on DevelopmentRan Mo, Haopeng Song, Wei Ding, Chaochao WuICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Silence False Alarms: Identifying Anti-Reentrancy Patterns on Ethereum to Refine Smart Contract Reentrancy DetectionQiyang Song, Heqing Huang, Xiaoqi Jia, Yuanbo Xie et al.NDSS 2025
