HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics Collection for Tor
Akshaya Mani, Micah Sherr
Abstract
A large volume of existing research attempts to understand who uses Tor and how the network is used (and misused). However, conducting measurements on the live Tor network, if done improperly, can endanger the security and anonymity of the millions of users who depend on the network to enhance their online privacy. Indeed, several existing measurement studies of Tor have been heavily criticized for unsafe research practices. Tor needs privacy-preserving methods of gathering statistics. The recently proposed PrivEx system demonstrates how data can be safely collected on Tor using techniques from differential privacy. However, as we demonstrate in this paper, the integrity of the statistics reported by PrivEx is brittle under realistic deployment conditions. An adversary who operates even a single relay in the volunteer-operated anonymity network can arbitrarily influence the result of PrivEx queries. We argue that a safe and useful data collection mechanism must provide both privacy and integrity protections. This paper presents HisTor , a privacy-preserving statistics collection scheme based on ( , δ)-differential privacy that is robust against adversarial manipulation. We formalize the security guarantees of HisTor and show using historical data from the Tor Project that HisTor provides useful data collection and reporting with low bandwidth and processing overheads. 2 HisTor is pronounced as "history." Permission to freely reproduce all or part of this paper for noncommercial purposes is granted provided that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Reproduction for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Internet Society, the first-named author (for reproduction of an entire paper only), and the author's employer if the paper was prepared within the scope of employment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3604503f-3476-4e19-8e6b-ffd63e6d65c9Cited by top-tier papers7
- Distributed Measurement with Private Set-Union CardinalityEllis Fenske, Akshaya Mani, Aaron Johnson, Micah SherrCCS 2017 · 27 citations
- Privacy-Preserving Dynamic Learning of Tor Network TrafficRob Jansen, Matthew Traudt, Nicholas HopperCCS 2018 · 26 citations
- How to Make Private Distributed Cardinality Estimation Practical, and Get Differential Privacy for FreeChanghui Hu, Jin Li, Zheli Liu, Xiaojie Guo et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 22 citations
- Once is Never Enough: Foundations for Sound Statistical Inference in Tor Network ExperimentationRob Jansen, Justin Tracey, Ian GoldbergUSENIX Security 2021 · 21 citations
- Characterizing the Nature and Dynamics of Tor Exit BlockingRachee Singh, Rishab Nithyanand, Sadia Afroz, Paul Pearce et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 6 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Ghostor: Toward a Secure Data-Sharing System from Decentralized TrustYuncong Hu, Sam Kumar, Raluca Ada PopaNSDI 2020 · 48 citations
- Dissecting Tor Bridges: A Security Evaluation of their Private and Public InfrastructuresSrdjan Matic, Carmela Troncoso, Juan CaballeroNDSS 2017 · 21 citations
- Stormy: Statistics in Tor by Measuring SecurelyRyan Wails, Aaron Johnson, Daniel Starin, Arkady Yerukhimovich et al.CCS 2019 · 2 citations
- Click Without Compromise: Online Advertising Measurement via Per User Differential PrivacyYingtai Xiao, Jian Du, Shikun Zhang, Wanrong Zhang et al.S&P 2025
- Differentially-private software frequency profiling under linear constraintsHailong Zhang, Yu Hao, Sufian Latif, Raef Bassily et al.OOPSLA 2020 · 1 citation
