RMCBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models' Resistance to Malicious Code
Jiachi Chen, Qingyuan Zhong, Yanlin Wang, Kaiwen Ning, Yongkun Liu, Zenan Xu, Zhe Zhao, Ting Chen, Zibin Zheng
Abstract
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly influenced various aspects of software development activities. Despite their benefits, LLMs also pose notable risks, including the potential to generate harmful content and being abused by malicious developers to create malicious code. Several previous studies have focused on the ability of LLMs to resist the generation of harmful content that violates human ethical standards, such as biased or offensive content. However, there is no research evaluating the ability of LLMs to resist malicious code generation. To fill this gap, we propose RMCBench, the first benchmark comprising 473 prompts designed to assess the ability of LLMs to resist malicious code generation. This benchmark employs two scenarios: a textto-code scenario, where LLMs are prompted with descriptions to generate code, and a code-to-code scenario, where LLMs translate or complete existing malicious code. Based on RMCBench, we conduct an empirical study on the 11 representative LLMs to assess their ability to resist malicious code generation. Our findings indicate
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1c5a708c-e220-4911-9629-727d7f0dbf70Cited by top-tier papers14
- PurpCode: Reasoning for Safer Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Nirav Diwan, Zhe Wang, Haoyu Zhai et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security ResearchJonathan Evertz, Niklas Risse, Nicolai Neuer, Andreas Müller et al.NDSS 2026 · 17 citations
- RedCodeAgent: Automatic Red-teaming Agent against Diverse Code AgentsChengquan Guo, Chulin Xie, Yu Yang, Zhaorun Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- QuanBench: Benchmarking Quantum Code Generation with Large Language ModelsXiaoyu Guo, Minggu Wang, Jianjun ZhaoASE 2025 · 5 citations
- DrainCode: Stealthy Energy Consumption Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation via Context PoisoningYanli Wang, Jiadong Wu, Tianyue Jiang, Mingwei Liu et al.ASE 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
Related papers
- LLMs Caught in the Crossfire: Malware Requests and Jailbreak ChallengesHaoyang Li, Huan Gao, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhiyu Lin et al.ACL 2025
- Scam2Prompt: A Scalable Framework for Auditing Malicious Scam Endpoints in Production LLMsZhiyang Chen, Tara Saba, Xun Deng, Xujie Si et al.ICML 2026
- RealBench: A Repo-Level Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Software Development PracticesJia Li, Hongyi Deng, Yiran Zhang, Kechi Zhang et al.FSE 2026
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJustin Cui, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ion Stoica, Cho-Jui HsiehICML 2025
