Long Story Short: Auditing U.S. Political Polarization in Recommendations for Long- vs. Short-form Videos on YouTube
Shaokang Jiang, Arshia Arya, Seoyoung Kweon, Ivan Liang, Deepak Kumar, Kristen Vaccaro
Abstract
YouTube is the world's most widely used video platform, with over 70% of content viewed through algorithmic recommendations. While prior audits have examined polarization in YouTube's longform video recommendations, the platform's fast-growing Shorts feature remains understudied. In this paper, we present the first large-scale audit comparing political content exposure and engagement dynamics across short-form and long-form videos on YouTube. We design a matched audit based on the insight that many news media organizations publish both short and long versions of the same content and collect 50,000 pairs of long-form and short-form video recommendations from both political and nonpolitcal seed videos. We analyze recommendations along several dimensions: the frequency of political recommendations, the diversity of retrieved videos, the engagement those videos receive, and finally, the partisan alignment between recommended videos and seed videos. Our results highlight fundamental differences between each algorithm, which we hope we can inform future research in analyzing the impact of YouTube recommendations. CCS Concepts • Information systems → Recommender systems; • Humancentered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing; • Applied computing → Law, social and behavioral sciences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11f3450a-cc21-43a1-9d81-080f1e7cbec4Builds on6
- Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTubeEslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2020 · 233 citations
- An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTokMaximilian Boeker, Aleksandra UrmanWWW 2022 · 112 citations
- TikTok and the Art of Personalization: Investigating Exploration and Exploitation on Social Media FeedsKaran Vombatkere, Sepehr Mousavi, Savvas Zannettou, Franziska Roesner et al.WWW 2024 · 45 citations
- Assessing enactment of content regulation policies: A post hoc crowd-sourced audit of election misinformation on YouTubePrerna Juneja, Md Momen Bhuiyan, Tanushree MitraCHI 2023 · 33 citations
- Mapping the Design Space of Teachable Social Media Feed ExperiencesK. J. Kevin Feng, Xander Koo, Lawrence Tan, Amy S. Bruckman et al.CHI 2024 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Understanding the Effect of Opinion Polarization in Short Video BrowsingBangde Du, Ziyi Ye, Zhijing Wu, Monika Jankowska et al.SIGIR 2025 · 2 citations
- Paying Attention to the Algorithm Behind the Curtain: Bringing Transparency to YouTube's Demonetization AlgorithmsArun Dunna, Katherine A. Keith, Ethan Zuckerman, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez et al.CSCW 2022 · 13 citations
- Left or Right: A Peek into the Political Biases in Email Spam Filtering Algorithms During US Election 2020Hassan Iqbal, Usman Mahmood Khan, Hassan Ali Khan, Muhammad ShahzadWWW 2022 · 6 citations
- Deradicalizing YouTube: Characterization, Detection, and Personalization of Religiously Intolerant Arabic VideosNuha Albadi, Maram Kurdi, Shivakant MishraCSCW 2022 · 24 citations
- Lower Quantity, Higher Quality: Auditing News Content and User Perceptions on Twitter/X Algorithmic versus Chronological TimelinesStephanie T. Wang, Shengchun Huang, Alvin Zhou, Danaë MetaxaCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
