A Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Dialect Biases in Privacy Policy Question-Answering Systems
Dorde Klisura, Astrid R. Bernaga Torres, Anna Karen Gárate-Escamilla, Rajesh Roshan Biswal, Ke Yang, Hilal Pataci, Anthony Rios
Abstract
Privacy policies inform users about data collection and usage, yet their complexity limits accessibility for diverse populations. Existing Privacy Policy Question Answering (QA) systems exhibit performance disparities across English dialects, disadvantaging speakers of nonstandard varieties. We propose a novel multiagent framework inspired by human-centered design principles to mitigate dialectal biases. Our approach integrates a Dialect Agent, which translates queries into Standard American English (SAE) while preserving dialectal intent, and a Privacy Policy Agent, which refines predictions using domain expertise. Unlike prior approaches, our method does not require retraining or dialect-specific fine-tuning, making it broadly applicable across models and domains. Evaluated on PrivacyQA and Poli-cyQA, our framework improves GPT-4o-mini's zero-shot accuracy from 0.394 to 0.601 on Pri-vacyQA and from 0.352 to 0.464 on PolicyQA, surpassing or matching few-shot baselines without additional training data. These results highlight the effectiveness of structured agent collaboration in mitigating dialect biases and underscore the importance of designing NLP systems that account for linguistic diversity to ensure equitable access to privacy information. 2 Privacy policies typically encompass ten major categories of data practices. These include First Party Collection (FP), Third Party Sharing/Collection (TP), Data Retention (DR), and Data Security (DS), which explain how and why first and third parties collect, process, store, share, and protect customer data. User rights are addressed through categories like User Choice/Control (UCC), User Access, Edit, Deletion (UAED), and Do Not Track (DNT) (Wilson et al., 2016) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0aa2543f-49bc-497c-9ba6-d6a8f92275c0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- Privacy Policies over Time: Curation and Analysis of a Million-Document DatasetRyan Amos, Gunes Acar, Elena Lucherini, Mihir Kshirsagar et al.WWW 2021 · 135 citations
- HM-RAG: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Multimodal Retrieval Augmented GenerationPei Liu, Xin Liu, Ruoyu Yao, Junming Liu et al.ACM MM 2025 · 27 citations
- Multi-VALUE: A Framework for Cross-Dialectal English NLPCaleb Ziems, William Barr Held, Jingfeng Yang, Jwala Dhamala et al.ACL 2023 · 15 citations
- DIALECTBENCH: An NLP Benchmark for Dialects, Varieties, and Closely-Related LanguagesFahim Faisal, Orevaoghene Ahia, Aarohi Srivastava, Kabir Ahuja et al.ACL 2024 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Empowering Users in Digital Privacy Management through Interactive LLM-Based AgentsBolun Sun, Yifan Zhou, Haiyun JiangICLR 2025
- Polisis: Automated Analysis and Presentation of Privacy Policies Using Deep LearningHamza Harkous, Kassem Fawaz, Rémi Lebret, Florian Schaub et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 400 citations
- PrivAct: Internalizing Contextual Privacy Preservation via Multi-Agent Preference TrainingYuhan Cheng, Hancheng Ye, Hai Li, Jingwei Sun et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- PolicyPulse: Precision Semantic Role Extraction for Enhanced Privacy Policy ComprehensionAndrick Adhikari, Sanchari Das, Rinku DewriNDSS 2025
- Privacy at Scale: Introducing the PrivaSeer Corpus of Web Privacy PoliciesMukund Srinath, Shomir Wilson, C. Lee GilesACL 2021
