Variational Deep Learning via Implicit Regularization
Jonathan Wenger, Beau Coker, Juraj Marusic, John Patrick Cunningham
Abstract
Modern deep learning models generalize remarkably well in-distribution, despite being overparametrized and trained with little to no explicit regularization. Instead, current theory credits implicit regularization imposed by the choice of architecture, hyperparameters, and optimization procedure. However, deep neural networks can be surprisingly non-robust, resulting in overconfident predictions and poor out-of-distribution generalization. Bayesian deep learning addresses this via model averaging, but typically requires significant computational resources as well as carefully elicited priors to avoid overriding the benefits of implicit regularization. Instead, in this work, we propose to regularize variational neural networks solely by relying on the implicit bias of (stochastic) gradient descent. We theoretically characterize this inductive bias in overparametrized linear models as generalized variational inference and demonstrate the importance of the choice of parametrization. Empirically, our approach demonstrates strong in-and outof-distribution performance without additional hyperparameter tuning and with minimal computational overhead. Bayesian Deep Learning Approximate Bayesian techniques like the Laplace approximation [24] [25] [26] , stochastic weight averaging [27, 28] , deep ensembles [29], and variational approaches [30] [31] [32] [33] attempt to address the aforementioned shortcomings of deep learning by learning a distribution over functions as opposed to merely a point estimate. The idea being that a weighted combination of models, all of which achieve low training error, generalizes more robustly while at the same time providing uncertainty quantification. Variational Inference In Bayesian inference this weighted combination is defined by the posterior distribution p(w | X, y) ∝ p(y | X, w)p(w) over weights, induced by a likelihood p(y | w) and
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 084e6de5-ad29-4d1c-a138-94d2decbbef9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on24
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of GeneralizationAndrew Gordon Wilson, Pavel IzmailovNeurIPS 2020 · 845 citations
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance AwarenessJeremiah Z. Liu, Zi Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Dustin Tran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 604 citations
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
- What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?Pavel Izmailov, Sharad Vikram, Matthew D. Hoffman, Andrew Gordon WilsonICML 2021 · 458 citations
- Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural NetworksGreg Yang, Edward J. HuICML 2021 · 242 citations
Related papers
- Structured Dropout Variational Inference for Bayesian Neural NetworksSon Nguyen, Duong Nguyen, Khai Nguyen, Khoat Than et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 11 citations
- Convergence Rates of Variational Inference in Sparse Deep LearningBadr-Eddine Chérief-AbdellatifICML 2020 · 43 citations
- Walsh-Hadamard Variational Inference for Bayesian Deep LearningSimone Rossi, Sébastien Marmin, Maurizio FilipponeNeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- Deep Variational Implicit ProcessesLuis A. Ortega, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- Implicit Neural Representation Inference for Low-Dimensional Bayesian Deep LearningPanagiotis Dimitrakopoulos, Giorgos Sfikas, Christophoros NikouICLR 2024
