Instructing Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Study for Basque
Oscar Sainz, Naiara Pérez, Julen Etxaniz, Joseba Fernandez de Landa, Itziar Aldabe, Iker García-Ferrero, Aimar Zabala, Ekhi Azurmendi, German Rigau, Eneko Agirre, Mikel Artetxe, Aitor Soroa
Abstract
Instructing language models with user intent requires large instruction datasets, which are only available for a limited set of languages. In this paper, we explore alternatives to conventional instruction adaptation pipelines in low-resource scenarios. We assume a realistic scenario for low-resource languages, where only the following are available: corpora in the target language, existing open-weight multilingual base and instructed backbone LLMs, and synthetically generated instructions sampled from the instructed backbone. We present a comprehensive set of experiments for Basque that systematically study different combinations of these components evaluated on benchmarks and human preferences from 1, 680 participants. Our conclusions show that target language corpora are essential, with synthetic instructions yielding robust models, and, most importantly, that using as backbone an instruction-tuned model outperforms using a base non-instructed model. Scaling up to Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B as backbone, our model comes near frontier models of much larger sizes for Basque, without using any Basque instructions. We release code, models, instruction datasets, and human preferences to support full reproducibility in future research on low-resource language adaptation. 1 User: What's the difference between primary vs secondary market research? Assistant: Primary market research involves collecting original data directly from the source, such as through surveys, focus groups, or experiments. This type of research is typically more expensive and time-consuming but provides unique and specific insights. Secondary market research, on the other hand, involves analyzing existing data that has already been collected by someone else, such as academic studies, industry reports, or government statistics. This type of research is often less expensive and faster to conduct but may not provide the same level of specificity or relevance as primary research. Here are some key differences between primary and secondary market research: Primary Market Research * Collects original data directly from the source * Can be tailored to specific research questions or objectives * Provides unique and specific insights * Typically more expensive and time-consuming * Examples: surveys, focus groups, experiments, customer interviews Secondary Market Research * Analyzes existing data collected by someone else * Often less expensive and faster to conduct * May not provide the same level of specificity or relevance * Examples: academic studies, industry reports, government statistics, online reviews, social media analytics When deciding between primary and secondary market research, consider the following factors: User: Zein da merkatu ikerketa primarioaren eta bigarren mailakoaren arteko aldea?
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 06c6bc33-b96a-49eb-b92a-14fcfa1b359fCited by top-tier papers2
- Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Target Language Adaptation of LLMs via Source-Shielded UpdatesAtsuki Yamaguchi, Terufumi Morishita, Aline Villavicencio, Nikolaos AletrasACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Fluent Alignment with Disfluent Judges: Post-training for lower-resource languagesDavid Samuel, Lilja Øvrelid, Erik Velldal, Andrey KutuzovICLR 2026
Builds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
Related papers
- Latxa: An Open Language Model and Evaluation Suite for BasqueJulen Etxaniz, Oscar Sainz, Naiara Miguel, Itziar Aldabe et al.ACL 2024 · 5 citations
- Selecting Backtranslated Data from Multiple Sources for Improved Neural Machine TranslationXabier Soto, Dimitar Sht. Shterionov, Alberto Poncelas, Andy WayACL 2020 · 1 citation
- WangchanThaiInstruct: An instruction-following Dataset for Culture-Aware, Multitask, and Multi-domain Evaluation in ThaiPeerat Limkonchotiwat, Pume Tuchinda, Lalita Lowphansirikul, Surapon Nonesung et al.EMNLP 2025
- Pretraining Language Models Using TranslationeseMeet Doshi, Raj Dabre, Pushpak BhattacharyyaEMNLP 2024
- Knowledge Transfer from High-Resource to Low-Resource Programming Languages for Code LLMsFederico Cassano, John Gouwar, Francesca Lucchetti, Claire Schlesinger et al.OOPSLA 2024 · 33 citations
