# Lune vs Jenni

Jenni writes with you: autocomplete, edits, chat over uploaded PDFs, citations dropped into the draft. Lune writes nothing. It supplies the evidence your agent writes from, and checks what you already wrote.

Competitor site: https://jenni.ai.

## Choose Jenni if

- Getting words on the page is the bottleneck.
- You want citation formatting handled inside the editor.
- Chatting with uploaded PDFs while you draft is how you work.

## Choose Lune if

- The words are fine; the citations are the risk.
- You want each claim matched to a quote you can read.
- You already draft in an agent and do not want another editor.

## From a question to a citation

Jenni: Draft in the editor -> Autocomplete and edit -> Citation inserted.
Lune: Send the claim -> Read the full text -> Quote with a locator.

One helps you write the sentence. The other proves it.

## Line by line

| Dimension | Lune | Jenni |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Who writes | Your agent. Lune has no editor. | Jenni, with you, in its own editor. |
| Where sources come from | Top-tier venues, most papers in full text, plus your uploads. | PDFs you upload, plus its citation search. |
| How a claim is backed | A verbatim quote and its locator, per claim. | A citation inserted next to the sentence. |
| Where it runs | Any MCP client, plus a CLI and three miniapps. | The Jenni web editor. |
| Limits that bite | Requests a day. That is the only meter. | Autocompletes, chat messages, edits and uploads, all tiered. |
| Entry price | $4.99 a month ($47.90 a year), or free for 10 requests a day. | $12 a month for Plus, $29 for Pro. |

## Writing help and evidence are separate purchases

Jenni is one of the most used academic writing tools there is, and if the blank page is your problem it solves the blank page. Citation insertion in the editor is genuinely convenient.

Convenience is also where citation risk enters. A reference dropped in beside a sentence looks finished whether or not the paper supports what the sentence says, and nothing in the writing flow forces that question.

## What Lune refuses to do

Lune will not draft your paragraph. That is not a missing feature; the model in your agent already writes better than a bolted-on editor, and the part it cannot do is remember what a paper actually reported.

So the tools answer only with what they found: the quote, its location, or nothing at all. Nothing found is a real answer here, and it is the one an autocomplete can never give you.

## Pricing

- Lune Free: $0, 10 requests a day, every tool
- Lune Pro: $4.99, a month or $47.90 a year, 300 requests a day
- Lune Max: $9.99, a month or $95.90 a year, 600 requests a day
- Lune Credits: $0.99, 300 extra requests, no expiry
- Jenni Free: $0, 10 autocompletes a day
- Jenni Plus: $12, a month, 5,000 autocompletes
- Jenni Pro: $29, a month, unlimited

ScholarAI's research features are also surfaced inside Jenni.

## Questions

### Is Lune a Jenni alternative?

Not for writing. Lune supplies and checks evidence; Jenni helps produce the prose. Many people would use one of each.

### Does Lune write my paper?

No. Your agent writes, and Lune answers with quotes. Its Critique miniapp reviews a draft against reviewer expectations.

### Can I use both?

Yes. Draft where you like, then check the claims against source text before it goes anywhere.

## What we read

- [jenni.ai](https://jenni.ai)
- [Pricing](https://jenni.ai/pricing)